4 ms·
Their graphs are showing a large growth in 2017 which are pure predictions. To makes matters worse they are not marked as such which is misleading.
by tener 10y ago
Their graphs are showing a large growth in 2017 which are pure predictions. To makes matters worse they are not marked as such which is misleading.
- Maakuth 10y agoHow can anything concerning future be something else than pure prediction? Do you mean like already agreed orders with delivery dates in 2017?
- B1FF_PSUVM 10y agoThere are two wrinkles here: - "Fiscal 2017" may not be the calendar year, e.g. it could comprise April-2016 to March-2017. (I don't know the specifics here, but accounting is weird that way.) - There's booking, and "book-to-bill ratio" in the semiconductor industry. I.e. the pre-orders are recorded quite a bit in advance, but actual shipments (and payments) may vary.
- mcbits 10y agoRight, the graph goes up to Q3 of Nvidia's fiscal 2017, which just ended on October 30. So apparently the fiscal year will end sometime in January. http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial-results-for-third-quarter-fiscal-2017 http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-financial...
- EugeneOZ 10y agoFor me not obvious why they predict small failure in sales in Q1 2017, if 1080ti will be released in Q1 2017 - and by current information it will be awesome card for gaming.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]