Sorry, but no. Although the sequence of words "You may pay for the cost of parking...." does appear in the article, it is at best a trite gloss of the article'

Sorry, but no. Although the sequence of words "You may pay for the cost of parking...." does appear in the article, it is at best a trite gloss of the article's thesis. And as for the 'poor people' angle, the article runs 426 words according to the word count facility in OpenOffice Writer, of which ~100 are devoted to the effects on the poor. The article's title is neither misleading nor clickbait.