2 ms·
There's no question that 538 is anti-Trump. That shouldn't affect their statistical model, which gave much higher odds to Trump than most other models. I don't
by Houshalter 10y ago
There's no question that 538 is anti-Trump. That shouldn't affect their statistical model, which gave much higher odds to Trump than most other models. I don't see the relevance of either of those links.
- SixSigma 10y agoThe point of the other links is that Nate is compromising his professional image through punditry. If I asked a consultant for advice on the future of my sector of the economy and then found a series of blog posts bashing my industry which were all unfounded, I would call his judgment into question. At best, he is trying to influence the very thing he is supposed to me impartially analysing.