3 ms·

Is your point that both of these options have an equal or negligible effect on the poor, that one option is better but those damn "poverty activists" can't see

• employee8000 10y ago
  My point is that you can force any argument you want to fit your own narrative. So out of thin air you can pull whatever you want and spin it so that it's some form of oppression of the rich on the poor. To blame parking spaces for raising prices is really pathetic and delusional. The problem is that different factions of poverty activists will pick differing things to be offended by, so one group may think that having free parking space is the rich oppressing the poor, but if the store changes it to paid parking, other activists will say that is oppressing the poor. However it's reported the same way so it makes it sound like all poverty activists are in unison but they're not. But the media doesn't care as long as the rich are being vilified.