2 ms·

This discussion has veered away from the thread topic, but, regardless, thank you for presenting data. My major reservation here is that it seems a bit disingen

This discussion has veered away from the thread topic, but, regardless, thank you for presenting data. My major reservation here is that it seems a bit disingenuous to highlight suicide, while at the same time not including injury, rape, or loss of property that result from home invasions.

ux-app 10y ago
No worries :) > seems a bit disingenuous to highlight suicide, while at the same time not including injury, rape, or loss of property that result from home invasions. Nothing disingenuous about it. In fact, statistically speaking, the situation is even worse. Introducing a gun into an already violent encounter significantly increases the risk of injury and death. There is tonnes of evidence to support this. Here is one, very specific study that indirectly confirms exactly this. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249715169_Have_Gun_Will_ShootWeapon_Instrumentality_Intent_and_the_Violent_Escalation_of_Conflict https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249715169_Have_Gun_... And here's another fascinating study PREDICTORS OF FIREARM USE AND EFFECTS OF WEAPONRY ON VICTIM INJURY IN VIOLENT CRIME http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0002722/Libby_Nicholas_E_200908_PhD.pdf http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0002722/Libby_Nicholas_E_200908_Ph... It's a long read, but well worth it if you are really interested in what the literature has to say about the often surprising ways in which guns affect the outcomes of violent crime. And finally here's a pretty honest take on the matter from a comedian. NSFW for language https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0 The humor may not be to your taste, but the points made are fair
- masonic 10y ago
  Here is one, very specific study that indirectly confirms exactly this. Interviews of 100 incarcerated felons (with a specific incentive to discourage gun ownership), without any actual data (even anecdotal), confirms nothing. Did you bother to read any of your quoted research before cutting-and-pasting?
  - ux-app 10y ago
    so you didn't like that source, did you bother to read any of the other many sources I supplied? Guess not since they don't support your world view. Like i said I'm not anti gun. But saying I own a gun for protection is kind of like saying "I BASE jump to stay fit". No you don't. You do it because it's dangerous and fun. Guns are the same. I wish more gun owners were intellectually honest and just admitted that they like their dangerous hobby in spite of the fact that - Their chance of being a victim of violent crime such as home invasion or car jacking is unbelievably tiny - The chance that they or a family member will be killed or injured by a family owned gun utterly dwarfs the chance that said gun will actually prevent violent crime These are facts borne out 100% by data. from [1], which gets most of it's data from government collected statistics. These are stats just for accidental injury!: - "In 2010, unintentional firearm injuries caused the deaths of 606 people.18" - "From 2005-2010, almost 3,800 people in the U.S. died from unintentional shootings.19" - "Over 1,300 victims of unintentional shootings for the period 2005–2010 were under 25 years of age.20" - "People of all age groups are significantly more likely to die from unintentional firearm injuries when they live in states with more guns, relative to states with fewer guns. On average, states with the highest gun levels had nine times the rate of unintentional firearms deaths compared to states with the lowest gun levels.21" - "A federal government study of unintentional shootings found that 8% of such shooting deaths resulted from shots fired by children under the age of six.22" Again, from [2], "Nationwide, there are about 100 burglary-homicides every year.". 100 homicides for the ENTIRE USA related to burglary!! And i'd speculate that a significant number of these deaths were due to victims escalating the situation by drawing a gun! That means you are 6 times as likely to accidentally kill yourself than be the victim of a murder during a burglary. [1] http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-deaths-and-injuries-statistics/ http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-deaths-and-injuries-statistics/ [2] http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/12/gun-violence-and-the-irrational-fear-of-home-invasion/266613/ http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/12/gun-viol...
    - masonic 10y ago
      Yet again, you dodge the question, and yet again, you refer to media articles that quote no actual data. I read each of the "studies" you refer to in the years they were released, and many, many more. I've been studying criminology for 23 years. Repeating the "I'm not anti-gun" mantra whilst referring only to anti-RKBA sources (and misquoting those) reinforces intellectual dishonesty. And as for "Their chance of being a victim of violent crime such as home invasion or car jacking is unbelievably tiny", you really haven't examined the data. There are dozens of carjackings and home invasions (aka "hot burglary" - entering when residents are present) each month in the Bay Area alone. If you rely only on media reports, they are typically reported only as "burglaries". What is actually "unbelievably tiny" is one's odds of being killed by an "assault weapon", yet phony claims to the contrary drive the media narrative. Drownings excluding those in swimming pools exceed homicide by "assault weapon" in the U.S.

ux-app 10y ago

No worries :) > seems a bit disingenuous to highlight suicide, while at the same time not including injury, rape, or loss of property that result from home invasions. Nothing disingenuous about it. In fact, statistically speaking, the situation is even worse. Introducing a gun into an already violent encounter significantly increases the risk of injury and death. There is tonnes of evidence to support this. Here is one, very specific study that indirectly confirms exactly this. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249715169_Have_Gun_Will_ShootWeapon_Instrumentality_Intent_and_the_Violent_Escalation_of_Conflict https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249715169_Have_Gun_... And here's another fascinating study PREDICTORS OF FIREARM USE AND EFFECTS OF WEAPONRY ON VICTIM INJURY IN VIOLENT CRIME http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0002722/Libby_Nicholas_E_200908_PhD.pdf http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0002722/Libby_Nicholas_E_200908_Ph... It's a long read, but well worth it if you are really interested in what the literature has to say about the often surprising ways in which guns affect the outcomes of violent crime. And finally here's a pretty honest take on the matter from a comedian. NSFW for language https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0 The humor may not be to your taste, but the points made are fair

masonic 10y ago
Here is one, very specific study that indirectly confirms exactly this. Interviews of 100 incarcerated felons (with a specific incentive to discourage gun ownership), without any actual data (even anecdotal), confirms nothing. Did you bother to read any of your quoted research before cutting-and-pasting?
- ux-app 10y ago
  so you didn't like that source, did you bother to read any of the other many sources I supplied? Guess not since they don't support your world view. Like i said I'm not anti gun. But saying I own a gun for protection is kind of like saying "I BASE jump to stay fit". No you don't. You do it because it's dangerous and fun. Guns are the same. I wish more gun owners were intellectually honest and just admitted that they like their dangerous hobby in spite of the fact that - Their chance of being a victim of violent crime such as home invasion or car jacking is unbelievably tiny - The chance that they or a family member will be killed or injured by a family owned gun utterly dwarfs the chance that said gun will actually prevent violent crime These are facts borne out 100% by data. from [1], which gets most of it's data from government collected statistics. These are stats just for accidental injury!: - "In 2010, unintentional firearm injuries caused the deaths of 606 people.18" - "From 2005-2010, almost 3,800 people in the U.S. died from unintentional shootings.19" - "Over 1,300 victims of unintentional shootings for the period 2005–2010 were under 25 years of age.20" - "People of all age groups are significantly more likely to die from unintentional firearm injuries when they live in states with more guns, relative to states with fewer guns. On average, states with the highest gun levels had nine times the rate of unintentional firearms deaths compared to states with the lowest gun levels.21" - "A federal government study of unintentional shootings found that 8% of such shooting deaths resulted from shots fired by children under the age of six.22" Again, from [2], "Nationwide, there are about 100 burglary-homicides every year.". 100 homicides for the ENTIRE USA related to burglary!! And i'd speculate that a significant number of these deaths were due to victims escalating the situation by drawing a gun! That means you are 6 times as likely to accidentally kill yourself than be the victim of a murder during a burglary. [1] http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-deaths-and-injuries-statistics/ http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-deaths-and-injuries-statistics/ [2] http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/12/gun-violence-and-the-irrational-fear-of-home-invasion/266613/ http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/12/gun-viol...
  - masonic 10y ago
    Yet again, you dodge the question, and yet again, you refer to media articles that quote no actual data. I read each of the "studies" you refer to in the years they were released, and many, many more. I've been studying criminology for 23 years. Repeating the "I'm not anti-gun" mantra whilst referring only to anti-RKBA sources (and misquoting those) reinforces intellectual dishonesty. And as for "Their chance of being a victim of violent crime such as home invasion or car jacking is unbelievably tiny", you really haven't examined the data. There are dozens of carjackings and home invasions (aka "hot burglary" - entering when residents are present) each month in the Bay Area alone. If you rely only on media reports, they are typically reported only as "burglaries". What is actually "unbelievably tiny" is one's odds of being killed by an "assault weapon", yet phony claims to the contrary drive the media narrative. Drownings excluding those in swimming pools exceed homicide by "assault weapon" in the U.S.