2 ms·
Pretty sweet. From and end-user perspective, quite a lot better than many of the WYSIWYG editors I've used in the past! (Haven't looked at the code.) A few pos
by peller 10y ago
Pretty sweet. From and end-user perspective, quite a lot better than many of the WYSIWYG editors I've used in the past! (Haven't looked at the code.)
A few possible considerations for (IMO improved) usability:
* Tooltips for the icons! I didn't notice an undo button either, so this makes experimenting by just clicking on things more risky (esp a more common attitude amongst older users). For example, "x" often means close, not delete. A trash can might be less ambiguous.
* What does the mirror icon at top-center do? (I eventually figured out it meant preview, but, that wasn't obvious to me)
* The slide-in-from-the-side animation on section drag is in my opinion kind of distracting. Perhaps try having it "fade in" instead?
* When editing text in-place, the "accept changes" box hovers very close to the cursor. Would it be possible to have it jump on a paragraph increment, instead of by individual lines?
They're nit-picky, sure, but that's only because it's already pretty well polished :)
- abdullahmara 10y agoThanks for comment, Yes many features are missing or extra - I will consider your comment ^^