4 ms·
It is interesting to consider that we may not actually want a 'crime-free' neighborhood, depending on how crimes are defined, and the distribution of personal a
by marchenko 10y ago
It is interesting to consider that we may not actually want a 'crime-free' neighborhood, depending on how crimes are defined, and the distribution of personal and public costs associated with policing behavior and punishing offenders.
- cooper12 10y agoWired has a great article on this and how there has to be some latitude for law breaking: https://www.wired.com/2013/06/why-i-have-nothing-to-hide-is-the-wrong-way-to-think-about-surveillance/ https://www.wired.com/2013/06/why-i-have-nothing-to-hide-is-....
- lifeisstillgood 10y agoI quite agree. Facial recognition could have spotted Rosa Parks and simply shut the door to the bus. Again, how we use the technology is vital. But open and free technologies and data feeds are far far less likely to be abused or if they are are much easier to spot.