I'm not disagreeing but I think it can also be hard to trace it back and be absolutely 100% on this. If Snowden hadn't committed the activities he did and reve

I'm not disagreeing but I think it can also be hard to trace it back and be absolutely 100% on this. If Snowden hadn't committed the activities he did and revealed more information about the scope and breadth of the surveillance state, would that be good or bad? Did those activities help affirm your stance on surveillance? If so, can we truly consider them traitorous (outside of a legal standpoint)? Now, you folks are probably far better at logic puzzles than but as someone that fits the bill of pro-privacy and liberty and still questioning how to classify him, I'm open to other ways of arguing for or against.