It's not clear what exactly you're arguing. The loophole isn't all that complicated: Uber is effectively an employer by any reasonably consistent judgement. T

It's not clear what exactly you're arguing. The loophole isn't all that complicated: Uber is effectively an employer by any reasonably consistent judgement. They've decided to unilaterally declare their employees independent contractors, a designation that's been challenged in multiple jurisdictions, in an effort to skirt labor law. If you're saying the loophole is a good thing because it suits your "political/economic beliefs", that's fine, but that doesn't make it not a loophole.