Ya, I find this article annoying because it wasn't "factiness" that the polls showed Clinton leading. It was a fact. It's also a fact that we now know that th

Ya, I find this article annoying because it wasn't "factiness" that the polls showed Clinton leading. It was a fact. It's also a fact that we now know that the polls themselves had some kind of measurement or sample error, and that whatever this error was, it or something like it also happened in the Brexit and Canadian election. I'll take facts over punditry any day, even if they have errors, because errors can be corrected more easily than opinions.