3 ms·
With all due respect, I think you are simply overwhelmed. Specifically, this: >which will have rippling negative effects around the world. We don't know that.
by Jugurtha 10y ago
With all due respect, I think you are simply overwhelmed. Specifically, this:
>which will have rippling negative effects around the world.
We don't know that.
>to what will very clearly be an abominable and destructive regime.
Nothing clear about that.
>I came today expecting a community making plans to protect the vulnerable, to save the planet from climate catastrophe, to ensure the economic environment that has allowed Silicon Valley to flourish. Instead: "I’m a huge fan of Zelda, The Wind Waker’s graphics.".
Silicon Valley was not born to protect the vulnerable or save the planet, but to create technology. Often in the form of games and graphics.
To calm your spirits, let me try to put it succinctly:
People are trying to infer what kind of president he will be based on what kind of candidate he was. This doesn't work. When someone is a candidate, their job is to win at the game of being a candidate. This involves a certain tool-set: Scandals, digging up skeletons, making dead people vote, disinformation campaigns, promising a utopia, coming out as crazy, whatever gets the votes. Some are morally higher than this. It might work, but I don't think they ever become presidents, especially when others are playing by certain rules.
When a candidate is elected, though, they are the president and their job isn't to be a candidate anymore, it's to be a president. It's different.
Candidate Trump was something, but President-elect Trump is another thing, POTUS Trump will be something else because he needs to be.
- DefaultUserHN 10y agoExactly. People forgot that election smear is just that: smear. Both opponents will try their hardest to make the their opponent look bad. People need to realize that their image of Trump is not the real Trump, it is only the smeared version of Trump.
- grzm 10y agoLaudable sentiments. Are you willing to extend the same to Hillary?
- DefaultUserHN 10y agoOf course. Unfortunately, her e-mails are revealing a lot of stuff that are not just smears. Smears are smears when you have no way to prove it. But with Hillary, her emails are right there for everyone to see, to read, and judge for themselves. So I try to extend it to her too, but she made it impossible, especially since you don't need to rely on someone else telling you that she is corrupt. Instead, you can read the e-mail evidence for yourself and decide.