4 ms·
That's a grotesque misrepresentation of the article to change the title in that manner.
by btdiehr 10y ago
That's a grotesque misrepresentation of the article to change the title in that manner.
- ninkendo 10y agoThere's already a "could be" in the title, it seems redundant to put two may/could be's. You don't need to say that something "may be X so much that it could be Y", when you can either say "may be X so much that Y", or "is X so much that it could be Y".
- Fluid_Mechanics 10y agoThis is clearly the most grotesque and irresponsible headline I've read all week. /s
- btdiehr 10y agoYes because it's missing a quantifier which completely changes the meaning of the title. Only controversial to call this out because it's a climate change article thus impervious to any and all criticism obviously.