> does not properly account for the value of the stability the U.S. provides throughout the world now. Countries destroyed by brutal dictators propped up and

> does not properly account for the value of the stability the U.S. provides throughout the world now. Countries destroyed by brutal dictators propped up and supported by US might have something to say about the "stability" part there. > I think it's incredibly short-sighted. Or we could try a few more regime changes in Libya, maybe create another ISIS because that was lots of fun. I think "pax Americana" sounds not like you think it sounds to many countries in the world.