HN being full of sociopaths is well known. Being apologists for Thiel's odiousness is a new low. The man clearly states what he means, trying to 'clarify what

HN being full of sociopaths is well known. Being apologists for Thiel's odiousness is a new low. The man clearly states what he means, trying to 'clarify what he exactly means' is convuluted apologism and revisonism. This is like saying slave trade is wrong but you support it. Ok. If you agree with his views defend them on the platform of reason. Let's not get carried away here. Trump has not won because he is racist, nobody now thinks racism is ok. He has won because of the disenchantment with the establishment and his opposite number being widely perceived as a crook. If you think minorities and women are somehow different from you it will appear as bigotry unless you can offer some evidence or reason beyond generalising entire sections of humanity for some self serving and dubious cause.