For someone looking from the outside, it seemed like 90%+ of the media were all on Clinton's payroll or had some kind of deal with her. It was disgusting, and

For someone looking from the outside, it seemed like 90%+ of the media were all on Clinton's payroll or had some kind of deal with her. It was disgusting, and one of the reasons why I feared a Clinton presidency. So much of the media being unwilling to criticize her and try to destroy her opponents so easily and so intensely. This coupled with the fact that Clinton herself was paying trolls to make positive comments about her on the Internet to the point where they had full control of one of the largest subreddit's on Reddit (likely with Reddit admins' tacit approval, for the same reason Google and Twitter was banning anti-Hillary hashtags and auto-suggestions) reminded me too much of Putin's Russia (ironically enough) to be comfortable with it. Also, NY Times was bad enough with this, I expected much more from them, but I'll never forgive or forget Washington Post's bias in this election. For a "general purpose" media entity, it was no better than Breitbart or such on the right. And it goes without saying that CNN, and often MSNBC were even worse. Those two I've already forgotten about.