4 ms·

You should click through to the actual emails, I read the emails/links behind the "top 10" and was bitterly disappointed to find nothing juicy at all. The quot

by jpgvm 10y ago

You should click through to the actual emails, I read the emails/links behind the "top 10" and was bitterly disappointed to find nothing juicy at all. The quotes are out of context, making them seem much worse than when you actually read the surrounding paragraphs. Good try by author of the site to make these seem interesting but to be honest her emails seem entirely pedestrian and boring.

crdoconnor 10y ago
You should click through and actually read them. So take #2 as an example: The open borders thing is pretty much slam dunk evidence that she wanted the TPP. Trump alluded to this in his last advert about "elites". Did she try to deny this? No, not really. She only came out against the TPP (weakly) after Sanders campaign hammered her on it and once the email was out in the open she lost all credibility on that. This was a particularly important issue to the rust belt, where she lost heavily. Even if you aren't, she was likely aware of all of this which is why she tried to conceal the paid speech where she said it.
- jpgvm 10y ago
  I don't see why this is interesting/damaging though. Sure TPP is bad news but I really don't see why her being weakly in support of it followed by weakly against it is really that damaging/interesting. Same goes with a bunch of the others. The one on her "paying" people to disrupt rallies is a bunch of garbage. She received what looks like a newsletter from something called MoveOn, perhaps she even donated money to it. This thing seems to organise people to to protest against things they find reprehensible (which is apparently Trump to these people). The site tries to make it out that she directly paid people to go and start a riot. In reality it looks like she may have donated money to this thing. Either way it's still entirely uninteresting, boring, run of the mill stuff. If there was really damaging emails I am sure they would be at #1.

by jpgvm 10y ago

crdoconnor 10y ago

You should click through and actually read them. So take #2 as an example: The open borders thing is pretty much slam dunk evidence that she wanted the TPP. Trump alluded to this in his last advert about "elites". Did she try to deny this? No, not really. She only came out against the TPP (weakly) after Sanders campaign hammered her on it and once the email was out in the open she lost all credibility on that. This was a particularly important issue to the rust belt, where she lost heavily. Even if you aren't, she was likely aware of all of this which is why she tried to conceal the paid speech where she said it.

jpgvm 10y ago
I don't see why this is interesting/damaging though. Sure TPP is bad news but I really don't see why her being weakly in support of it followed by weakly against it is really that damaging/interesting. Same goes with a bunch of the others. The one on her "paying" people to disrupt rallies is a bunch of garbage. She received what looks like a newsletter from something called MoveOn, perhaps she even donated money to it. This thing seems to organise people to to protest against things they find reprehensible (which is apparently Trump to these people). The site tries to make it out that she directly paid people to go and start a riot. In reality it looks like she may have donated money to this thing. Either way it's still entirely uninteresting, boring, run of the mill stuff. If there was really damaging emails I am sure they would be at #1.