> it described Flash as "closed and proprietary". Apple preferred to support more open standards which replicate everything Flash can do > The hypocrisy is sel

> it described Flash as "closed and proprietary". Apple preferred to support more open standards which replicate everything Flash can do > The hypocrisy is self evident in both cases > It isn't Color me completely and totally flabbergasted. If this is not transparently hypocritical, please share with us a definition of "closed and proprietary" that does not include Apple squarely in the middle. Apple's rules define a system so closed, that their own efforts in open and non-proprietary language, authoring and tool chains are unable to operate on their own platform! Really, you don't see this on your own?