3 ms·

The DNC was caught red handed funding political operatives to organise and fund protests at trump events that started the violent riots that unfolded. There is

The DNC was caught red handed funding political operatives to organise and fund protests at trump events that started the violent riots that unfolded. There is numerous videos of Trump supporters being assaulted by Democratic thugs. And at this very moment protest organised by MoveOn.org are smashing windows and starting fires in Oakland, LA, NY and other Democrat controlled cities. I do not see any healthy democratic virtue there at the DNC. It looks a lot like third world political intimidation tactics and violence. http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/24/leaked-emails-show-dnc-officials-planned-anti-trump-protests/ http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/24/leaked-emails-show-dnc-off...

knz 10y ago
I don't disagree re the DNC but do feel there is a difference between scuffles at a protest and openly condoning violence against specific people over multiple months.
- generic_user 10y ago
  I'm not understanding your point. The DNC has not only been condoning violence but actively organising and funding it. People have had to step down from there jobs at the DNC because of these scandals. I don't recall any time that Trump or anyone at the RNC 'openly condoning violence against specific people'. If there is some proof of this I would like to see it.
  - FireBeyond 10y ago
    Yeah, you're definitely not trying hard: - http://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-tells-crowd-to-knock-the-crap-out-of-protesters-offers-to-pay-legal-fees/ http://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-tells-crowd-to-knock-th... "Knock the crap out of them" complete with video and offers to pay legal fees - https://thinkprogress.org/donald-trump-my-fans-were-right-to-beat-up-black-protester-32639e4da487#.c64a5sozh https://thinkprogress.org/donald-trump-my-fans-were-right-to... - "Maybe he should have been roughed up." on Fox and Friends - https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-punch-him-in-the-face-protester-143811811.html https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-punch-him-in-the-fac... - "He's smiling [a protestor]. I'd like to punch him. Punch him right in the face." I find it ... 'odd' ... that you can be so well-informed about DNC issues but have "no recollection" (I love that phrase, works so well when people are being hauled in front of Congress) of any specific issue of violence from Trump or the RNC. In fact, here you go, someone's collated them all, with evidence: http://mashable.com/2016/03/12/trump-rally-incite-violence/#Tvv6zbWyDiqV http://mashable.com/2016/03/12/trump-rally-incite-violence/#... At least nine video captured incidents: - "I'll beat the crap out of you" - "Part of the problem... is no-one wants to hurt each other any more." - "The audience hit back. We need more of that." and so on. and so on. Yeah, no recollection. Because none of these events received much notice...
    - generic_user 10y ago
      Thanks for posting those links. The thing to think about is that the 'protesters' that showed up at the rallies were precisely the people the DNC sent there to try there hardest to stir up violence. The DNC sent those protesters to provoke violent confrontation that the Clinton media operatives at the networks could use to craft the narrative that trump was a big baddie. So while its not the sort of behaviour anyone want to see in an election. The fact remains that the entire scenario was being crafted by the DNC to damage there opponent which is far worse then what happened on the ground. The use of fake protesters sent to stir up violence at political events is an attack on democracy itself. And an attempt to shut down peoples write to participate in a democratic society. In that light the behaviour of Trump is quite understandable. Would you let a few paid protesters shut down your political rally?
      - FireBeyond 10y ago
        If that's the case, and it's also the case that Trump supporters showed up at rallies too (not that it's okay for one or another)... my solution would certainly not be to say "beat them up, and I'll pay your legal fees for you". Because paying someone to protest is one thing, inciting others to actual, physical violence and offering to pay 'costs', is a felony.
FireBeyond 10y ago
Undercover fomenting discord is entirely unacceptable and should be. But let's not pretend that was solely the domain of the DNC. Trump has stood in front of a camera and called for his supporters to beat people up at his rallies. He's said that people should be punched "right in the face". He's offered to pay legal fees for people charged with assault for attacking protestors. Also "caught" red handed. Except he was openly advocating for it.

knz 10y ago

I don't disagree re the DNC but do feel there is a difference between scuffles at a protest and openly condoning violence against specific people over multiple months.

generic_user 10y ago
I'm not understanding your point. The DNC has not only been condoning violence but actively organising and funding it. People have had to step down from there jobs at the DNC because of these scandals. I don't recall any time that Trump or anyone at the RNC 'openly condoning violence against specific people'. If there is some proof of this I would like to see it.
- FireBeyond 10y ago
  Yeah, you're definitely not trying hard: - http://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-tells-crowd-to-knock-the-crap-out-of-protesters-offers-to-pay-legal-fees/ http://www.mediaite.com/online/trump-tells-crowd-to-knock-th... "Knock the crap out of them" complete with video and offers to pay legal fees - https://thinkprogress.org/donald-trump-my-fans-were-right-to-beat-up-black-protester-32639e4da487#.c64a5sozh https://thinkprogress.org/donald-trump-my-fans-were-right-to... - "Maybe he should have been roughed up." on Fox and Friends - https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-punch-him-in-the-face-protester-143811811.html https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-punch-him-in-the-fac... - "He's smiling [a protestor]. I'd like to punch him. Punch him right in the face." I find it ... 'odd' ... that you can be so well-informed about DNC issues but have "no recollection" (I love that phrase, works so well when people are being hauled in front of Congress) of any specific issue of violence from Trump or the RNC. In fact, here you go, someone's collated them all, with evidence: http://mashable.com/2016/03/12/trump-rally-incite-violence/#Tvv6zbWyDiqV http://mashable.com/2016/03/12/trump-rally-incite-violence/#... At least nine video captured incidents: - "I'll beat the crap out of you" - "Part of the problem... is no-one wants to hurt each other any more." - "The audience hit back. We need more of that." and so on. and so on. Yeah, no recollection. Because none of these events received much notice...
  - generic_user 10y ago
    Thanks for posting those links. The thing to think about is that the 'protesters' that showed up at the rallies were precisely the people the DNC sent there to try there hardest to stir up violence. The DNC sent those protesters to provoke violent confrontation that the Clinton media operatives at the networks could use to craft the narrative that trump was a big baddie. So while its not the sort of behaviour anyone want to see in an election. The fact remains that the entire scenario was being crafted by the DNC to damage there opponent which is far worse then what happened on the ground. The use of fake protesters sent to stir up violence at political events is an attack on democracy itself. And an attempt to shut down peoples write to participate in a democratic society. In that light the behaviour of Trump is quite understandable. Would you let a few paid protesters shut down your political rally?
    - FireBeyond 10y ago
      If that's the case, and it's also the case that Trump supporters showed up at rallies too (not that it's okay for one or another)... my solution would certainly not be to say "beat them up, and I'll pay your legal fees for you". Because paying someone to protest is one thing, inciting others to actual, physical violence and offering to pay 'costs', is a felony.

FireBeyond 10y ago

Undercover fomenting discord is entirely unacceptable and should be. But let's not pretend that was solely the domain of the DNC. Trump has stood in front of a camera and called for his supporters to beat people up at his rallies. He's said that people should be punched "right in the face". He's offered to pay legal fees for people charged with assault for attacking protestors. Also "caught" red handed. Except he was openly advocating for it.