4 ms·
It reads like an emotion charged poorly proofread diary entry that could at some point be used as material for a company wide email. The fact that he just sent
by generic_user 10y ago
It reads like an emotion charged poorly proofread diary entry that could at some point be used as material for a company wide email.
The fact that he just sent that out like it is on an impulse hints that there is a whole lot of reflective internal composure and professionalism filters that are missing. Thats not what you want to see in a CEO.
The language is ambiguous and buzz wordy enough that angry Clinton supporters could take it as a call to purge there fellow colleagues. And likewise Trump supporters could see it as a call for them to resign.
Overall, the damage this is going to do is precisely why you do not mix your personal politics and your business.
- smsm42 10y agoThis also reads as reflex virtue signaling based on being sure that everybody in the company shares the same ideology bubble as the author, because all decent people do. This is only too frequent occurrence. No nuance was considered because none was necessary to consider - since everybody (worth considering) agrees anyway.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- inimino 10y agoExactly.