3 ms·

I think that's mostly Aaron being Aaron, it's not necessarily some form of anti-intellectualism but more like just his personality at work. I don't really have

by dakull 10y ago

I think that's mostly Aaron being Aaron, it's not necessarily some form of anti-intellectualism but more like just his personality at work. I don't really have a problem with the tone of the interview but more with how vague the proposed objectives are. Also, there seem to be some rather misleading facts in it - like the AOT and the 30% speed-up - in practice, after testing it - it helped to load Rails faster but other than that the benchmarks were virtually identical (don't get me wrong, booting Rails faster is great but they imply something completely different in the interview)

MrBra 10y ago
In fact what they said is that AOT only helps in the startup phase, making it 30% faster.
- dakull 10y ago
  Aaron: 30%? Matz: 30% is huge. Aaron: Yeah! Jonan: That seems like a pretty good improvement to me. Koichi: I do think so. Aaron: We just need a few more 30% improvements then Ruby 3x3 is done. Matz: Yeah, that means 30% of the time is spent in the compiler. EDIT: maybe they were joking once again?
  - netule 10y ago
    I hope so. I always thought that Ruby could greatly benefit from something like .pyc files in Python. I love working with Ruby; I get lots of work done in very little time. However, sometimes I just can't wrap my head around certain language design, documentation, and implementation decisions.
  - MrBra 10y ago
    Of course Aaron was joking at that point.
  - InAnEmergency 10y ago
    I think there was a miscommunication in the interview. He meant load/parse/compile time. See http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/activities/2016_railsconf_pub.pdf http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/activities/2016_railsconf_pub.pdf
  - _ko1 10y ago
    > Koichi: I do think so. This is mistake. I said "I don't think so". 30% is not enough.