4 ms·
Not sure I follow what you are arguing for. But what I am trying to say is that the EC is designed to protect us from people EXACTLY like trump. That is its pur
by btcboss 10y ago
Not sure I follow what you are arguing for. But what I am trying to say is that the EC is designed to protect us from people EXACTLY like trump. That is its purpose. It has nothing to do with Hillary getting the popular vote, although that does add to the argument.
- bdcravens 10y agoIf you had asked Hamilton his opinion on a woman or someone of African descent, what do you think he would have said? Even ignoring that, I suspect the founding fathers would have been aghast at the system of professional politicians. They would have similarly been aghast at Trump's personality and behavior, but I suspect his business experience would have been considered a positive.
- ng12 10y agoYou do realize a Trump supporter could have made exactly the same argument had the situation been reversed? That the Electoral College was designed to protect us from dishonest, cronyist politicians? Who decides that the EC should be protecting YOUR candidate? My argument is that I would like to see Electorates become real Electorates and that blaming them for Hillary's loss is just sour grapes.