4 ms·
Censorship of libel and intentional mischief is no vice.
by Afforess 10y ago
Censorship of libel and intentional mischief is no vice.
- istorical 10y agoIt's up to courts to decide whether something is libel or slander, not an algorithm or an engineer at Facebook. Private communication / media organizations like Facebook deciding what's acceptable and what's not would only be censorship.
- rhizome 10y agoAre you saying that Facebook is a government? By the same token as libelslander, censorship is a government task. Everything else is just business rules.
- Afforess 10y agoNo, it's not. Courts are a last resort, when private mediation has failed, not the first line of action. If I publish news articles claiming "the sky is the color red, and only evil people disagree", courts do not need to be involved for Facebook to bury my articles. Most mischief is obviously classifiable without outside mediation.
- mikestew 10y agoYou think the New York Times doesn't decide whether something is libel or slander before they print it in order to avoid having the "courts...decide whether something is libel or slander"? It's not a direct comparison, but close enough for me to dismantle the idea that only courts get a say on this.
- tomjen3 10y agoI just had a picture in my head of 60s white policeman in a southern state saying the last part, as he locked a way some civil rights protesters. One mans mischief and the causing of trouble is another persons fight for freedom.