The downvotes (not by me, BTW) are for using emotive language that criticizes by implication without advancing an actual argument. Consider this description of

The downvotes (not by me, BTW) are for using emotive language that criticizes by implication without advancing an actual argument. Consider this description of veterinary euthanasia: "I guess that legalizing poisoning pets was a natural outcome of allowing vets to buy poisons." If you used that language I think that most people would infer that you strongly object to veterinary euthanasia, but you haven't made an argument why it should be illegal to hasten the end.