2 ms·
Well, for me, it was usually because of the high quality commentary, wherein folks had rational discussions about the content of a piece rather than resorting t
by zzalpha 10y ago
Well, for me, it was usually because of the high quality commentary, wherein folks had rational discussions about the content of a piece rather than resorting to Reddit-style content-free snark that neither educates nor illuminates.
Funny how times change, eh?
- 551199 10y agoAll the dissident views about polls being outright wrong were met with disbelief when it was clear to anyone who looked that they were blatantly off. Mainly to create social proof to vote Clinton.