That case is extremely cloudy. There is no way to know what actually happened. But witnesses range from unreasonably in favor of the shooter: "Trayvon was reac

That case is extremely cloudy. There is no way to know what actually happened. But witnesses range from unreasonably in favor of the shooter: "Trayvon was reaching for a gun after be loud and beligerent and was shot in clear self defense", all the way to unreasonably in favor of the shot: "Trayvon was shot in cold blood and broad daylight by a bigot and a the shooter was let free because of institutional racism". To claim you know what happened is extremely showing of your lack of understanding of the situation or of your implicit bias.