The reviews on Comparably suggests the executives at Twitter are more of a problem than middle management. That is, they get a rating of 63/100, versus middle m

The reviews on Comparably suggests the executives at Twitter are more of a problem than middle management. That is, they get a rating of 63/100, versus middle management's 71/100. I suppose it doesn't matter either way, as 75/100 (or 80 is even better) would be the lowest score I'd be comfortable with. Ratings according to Engineers: executives = 66/100 and managers = 75/100. Either way, whoever's bad should go.