4 ms·
> but these kinds of costs are the costs you have to pay to live in a democracy Not really, we could randomly choose a few thousand people to vote and it would
by mrep 10y ago
> but these kinds of costs are the costs you have to pay to live in a democracy
Not really, we could randomly choose a few thousand people to vote and it would be practically just as effective without all the costs of having everyone vote. Better yet, you would probably get a better sample of the population too since it would not be biased towards people who normally vote.
- M_Grey 10y agoYou'd need perfect security... I mean perfect, or that would be a trivially easy system to control. The irony that the government subject to such a process would be needed to ensure the sanctity of that process should not be lost on you.
- mrep 10y agoTrue, but our current system is more like security through size in that we hope the sheer number of votes drowns out voter fraud. They both have problems and I'm not saying one is totally better than the other.