4 ms·
Correlation isn't really causation. Also have you read any of the responses posted on that reddit discussion? Here is some example of coorelation : http://www.
by iamcreasy 10y ago
Correlation isn't really causation. Also have you read any of the responses posted on that reddit discussion?
Here is some example of coorelation : http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations
Notice that even though the graph looks very similar, one thing is not related to another.
- happycodework 10y agoThe causation is they are microscopic ufos (vaccines), mercury is an electrical conductor and heavy metal and toxin (brain axons Vs infant development), and mercury was known to cause illness and be toxic since 500bc [dartmouth], and the perfect place for the flu virus to incubate would be somewhere wet warm and loving, like an incubator or womb (uturus/testies) The data is not spurious: there's a catalyst at 1975 when they doubled vaccine rate every 5 yrs, and the data is focusing on private/reproductive parts cancer and infant development. Anyway the strange part is that scientists just call names, post fud and try to slander my character. And I can't get any of them to look at the data. And hacker news and reddit just delete or group-down vote the data and hide and ignore it. Really frustrating experience dealing with the hn crowd. I had my 300+ karma on-topic post history account shadow banned for posting about mercury correlation.