"Should" they? What compensation do they offer owners in exchange for their popular political maneuvers? Maybe they should exhaust other avenues of solution b

"Should" they? What compensation do they offer owners in exchange for their popular political maneuvers? Maybe they should exhaust other avenues of solution before taking away someone else's ownership rights? Or you could just go with, "we know better, this is how we'll dispose of other people's property." This is the attitude that cost Clinton the election.