3 ms·
No I agree. Democracy is better than monarchy. But that's a super low bar to pass. Not something to be proud of. I think there are alternative systems that are
by Houshalter 10y ago
No I agree. Democracy is better than monarchy. But that's a super low bar to pass. Not something to be proud of. I think there are alternative systems that are even better.
Just as a start, switching to an alternative voting system would be amazing. It's been shown that systems like approval voting are a better improvement over plurality voting, then plurality voting is over monarchy (http://rangevoting.org/UniqBest.html#HugePos http://rangevoting.org/UniqBest.html#HugePos). And that still works in the framework of democracy. I'd ideally like to get rid of voting entirely and replace it with something like randomly sampling representatives from the population.
- mikeash 10y agoI don't think it's a such a low bar to pass. Historically, it's been a common and major problem. Overcoming it is both tough and significant. That said, I don't mean to dismiss concerns beyond that. My point is really just a long-winded "well, it could be a lot worse."