4 ms·
> Building housing lowers house prices in the future That's not strictly true -- if market participants pay attention to planned new starts, then the effect of
by smallnamespace 10y ago
> Building housing lowers house prices in the future
That's not strictly true -- if market participants pay attention to planned new starts, then the effect of additional supply should be seen immediately in today's prices.
- mikeyouse 10y agoIn a city like SF, that's far from given. There's the discount rate of rent-in-hand today vs. when the construction completes, but more importantly there's a ton of uncertainty around projects. Planned new starts means very little in a city / region that regularly scraps or significantly delays projects due to random bureaucratic machinations.
- smallnamespace 10y agoYou're right that information doesn't perfectly filter through and starts aren't a particularly reliable metric. My intended point was very narrow though: your default assumption should be that changes in expectations of future cashflows have an immediate impact on price, unless you can point to a particular market friction that prevents this adjustment. Basically, you should distinguish between timing of cash flows (which don't generally matter except for discounting), and the timing of the information flowing into the market (which does). If there were a credible plan to build more much housing and the market believed in it, it should affect the price more or less immediately. Discount rates are very low -- $1 a year from now is more or less worth $1 today.