6 ms·

It hasn't in Colorado. That's something that I know quite a few of us here in Colorado wonder; my friend who owns an upscale dispensary doesn't think anything

by evo_9 10y ago

It hasn't in Colorado. That's something that I know quite a few of us here in Colorado wonder; my friend who owns an upscale dispensary doesn't think anything will change but I'm not so certain. Esp. if the rumors that Trump approach various Republicans with the idea that as Vice-President they'd be calling all the shots. Mike Pence is kind of a wild-card, I really don't know what his stance is on legal mj but the little I have read doesn't inspire confidence that he'll take a reasonable approach to this.

madaxe_again 10y ago
Execution for all users. Seriously though, he's a regressive in every field, this included. https://www.leafly.com/news/politics/mike-pence-trumps-vp-pick-is-bad-news-for-cannabis-reform https://www.leafly.com/news/politics/mike-pence-trumps-vp-pi...
wmeredith 10y ago
That there will be no reasonable approach is correct. pence is not a man to be reasoned with. He doesn't know whether or not evolution is real and espouses teaching intelligent design in schools. He is a climate change skeptic and he believes conversion therapy for gays should be publicly funded[1]. 1. http://www.politifact.com/california/statements/2016/jul/28/gavin-newsom/true-mike-pence-advocated-conversion-therapy/ http://www.politifact.com/california/statements/2016/jul/28/...
- DoofusOfDeath 10y ago
  On the surface, it sounds like your saying that Pence can't be reasoned with based on a particular conclusion he's reached. If that's what you meant, it sounds like a bit if a logical stretch.
  - thomyorkie 10y ago
    If one has a tendency to reach unreasonable conclusions, is it not justified to question their ability to be reasoned with?
    - anonbanker 10y ago
      such a justification is dangerous and counter-productive, should you wish to continue having the ability to empathize with others in the future.
    - DoofusOfDeath 10y ago
      But your original post didn't simply state that you were doubtful if he could be reasoned with; you made a stronger statement: "pence is not a man to be reasoned with." I think that stronger statement is questionable for a few reasons: (1) It ignores the subjective element of your assessment regarding which of Pence's positions are reasonable or not reasonable. I very much doubt everyone on Hacker News would consider all of your strongly held beliefs rational, and vice versa. But that should be the starting point of our discussions, not the end of them. (2) You gave some examples of Pence's conclusions which you consider absurd, but you didn't give clear evidence that his reasoning processes are flawed that he's "not a person to be reasoned with". For example, if you could point to some discussions where he was unable or unwilling to adhere to basic, simple rules of logic, that would bolster your case.
      - thomyorkie 10y ago
        I don't disagree. For the record, I didn't make the original comment.
panzagl 10y ago
I think Colorado is fubar either way- once Humboldt County gets it's paperwork squared away the pot money will leave here like every other boom industry.
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]

by evo_9 10y ago

madaxe_again 10y ago

Execution for all users. Seriously though, he's a regressive in every field, this included. https://www.leafly.com/news/politics/mike-pence-trumps-vp-pick-is-bad-news-for-cannabis-reform https://www.leafly.com/news/politics/mike-pence-trumps-vp-pi...

wmeredith 10y ago

That there will be no reasonable approach is correct. pence is not a man to be reasoned with. He doesn't know whether or not evolution is real and espouses teaching intelligent design in schools. He is a climate change skeptic and he believes conversion therapy for gays should be publicly funded[1]. 1. http://www.politifact.com/california/statements/2016/jul/28/gavin-newsom/true-mike-pence-advocated-conversion-therapy/ http://www.politifact.com/california/statements/2016/jul/28/...

DoofusOfDeath 10y ago
On the surface, it sounds like your saying that Pence can't be reasoned with based on a particular conclusion he's reached. If that's what you meant, it sounds like a bit if a logical stretch.
- thomyorkie 10y ago
  If one has a tendency to reach unreasonable conclusions, is it not justified to question their ability to be reasoned with?
  - anonbanker 10y ago
    such a justification is dangerous and counter-productive, should you wish to continue having the ability to empathize with others in the future.
  - DoofusOfDeath 10y ago
    But your original post didn't simply state that you were doubtful if he could be reasoned with; you made a stronger statement: "pence is not a man to be reasoned with." I think that stronger statement is questionable for a few reasons: (1) It ignores the subjective element of your assessment regarding which of Pence's positions are reasonable or not reasonable. I very much doubt everyone on Hacker News would consider all of your strongly held beliefs rational, and vice versa. But that should be the starting point of our discussions, not the end of them. (2) You gave some examples of Pence's conclusions which you consider absurd, but you didn't give clear evidence that his reasoning processes are flawed that he's "not a person to be reasoned with". For example, if you could point to some discussions where he was unable or unwilling to adhere to basic, simple rules of logic, that would bolster your case.
    - thomyorkie 10y ago
      I don't disagree. For the record, I didn't make the original comment.

panzagl 10y ago

I think Colorado is fubar either way- once Humboldt County gets it's paperwork squared away the pot money will leave here like every other boom industry.

deleted 10y ago
[deleted]