3 ms·
This incident being a phone who some Apple fanboys claims to be stolen, not lost, I'd say a most definite "no".
by trezor 16y ago
This incident being a phone who some Apple fanboys claims to be stolen, not lost, I'd say a most definite "no".
- pohl 16y agoI think you've failed to capture he essence of the incident. Try this: http://jballer.tumblr.com/post/540967372/gizmodos-trade-secret-liability http://jballer.tumblr.com/post/540967372/gizmodos-trade-secr...
- pyre 16y agoHow to 'trade secrets' translate to 'computer crime?' If I steal the blueprints for the 'better mousetrap,' then does it become a 'computer crime' because I'm liable to stealing trade secrets?
- pohl 16y agoI don't follow you: Is someone claiming that trade secrets imply computer crime? The strongest claim that I see is that REACT is an appropriate resource to assign. Do you see anything about REACT that implies otherwise? http://www.reacttf.org/10701.html http://www.reacttf.org/10701.html It says on the bottom of their front page that they investigate trade secret matters: http://www.reacttf.org/2101.html http://www.reacttf.org/2101.html Why harp on the phrase "computer crime" in the first place? I don't see it mentioned on the REACT site at all. It appears to have been an oversimplification invented by a journalist and propagated here by jrockway's question.