4 ms·
May I self-promote and suggest Sass (http://sass-lang.org http://sass-lang.org)? It's much older and less buggy than Less, and the currently-in-beta Sass 3 supp
by nex3 16y ago
May I self-promote and suggest Sass (http://sass-lang.org http://sass-lang.org)? It's much older and less buggy than Less, and the currently-in-beta Sass 3 supports a CSS-style syntax (http://nex-3.com/posts/96-scss-sass-is-a-css-extension http://nex-3.com/posts/96-scss-sass-is-a-css-extension).
- gamache 16y ago+1 for Sass. Sass allows me to apply the same modularity and reuse principles to my CSS that I do to my code, so writing it is much faster and editing it is much easier. I played with a few other CSS processors over the last few years (Less, Moonfall, one or two others) but Sass is clearly in the lead. Thanks nex3 for a very useful tool. (Oh, and FWIW, I use it on a Perl website. You don't need to be on Rails to use Sass.)