5 ms·
Tesco Bank says attack cost it £2.5m and hit 9,000 people
- lifeisstillgood 10y agoIt's surprisingly frustrating not to have details on this - and indeed most other attacks. I think we as an industry need full disclosure on all attacks (anonymised to encourage reporting) However we as customers need full disclosure on all attacks with attribution so we can move our accounts to safer banks. A strange dichotomy
- lifeisstillgood 10y agoAt an average of £277/account it's interesting to speculate on the method used here By increasing levels of awfulness: - an inside job. Bad but humans have betrayed trust placed in them since long before Judas - a credentials exploit. It seems not to be a mass hit on ATMs as Tesco allowed people to keep withdrawing. So potentially a long term phishing exploit to gain passwords. But seems a very long game so ... - deep systems penetration on scale of Bank of Bangladesh. This would be worst for Tesco and for the industry - to have people inside with control over account transfers without your knowledge is a shutdown the bank level of problem. This seems unlikely too as they have not, y'know, shutdown the bank. So my speculation has led pretty much nowhere. We don't know what happened, so we cannot take sensible precautions. If I have to guess, it is not the worse case scenario. That's too horrific and Tesco has not seemingly rebuilt all its system from source. So I guess we plump for credentials exploit and a very fast offshore payment. It's doable if Tesco's anti-fraud is not at the top of the game (as they are new, run their own backend and are a grocers not a bank it's quite probable) Inside job seems unlikely - too many accounts too many things to go wrong. But I am jut guessing now. Too little data as Sherlock said