2 ms·

I never said it wasn't complex or could be meaningfully represented, but you were implying that they have more "data" than they are showing. If you are worried

I never said it wasn't complex or could be meaningfully represented, but you were implying that they have more "data" than they are showing. If you are worried because they are making "hidden associations" from this data, my question would be how to display that? How would they possibly show you all of the assumptions, associations, interpretations, and calculations they did, do, or will gather from your data? If you are going to fault them for not displaying that data, shouldn't it be possible to display it in the first place?

azinman2 10y ago
A fine grained list of thousands of items can have summaries. These summaries can reflect actual models, or be new ways of visualizing and digging into the data. Existing models can be depicted in a wide variety of ways. They could either be the results of previous decisions (description through action), they could be expressed as is should the model be more human-readable (e.g. text clusters), they could be visualized somewhat directly [1], or they could visualized indirectly [2]. "My activity" seems like a nice idea, but the execution ends up providing little value to few people. If the idea is transparency over Google's personal data on you (how they framed it in an email to me), it does a poor job. If the idea is a better understanding of yourself (quantified life), it does a poor job. If the idea is finding some youtube video you watched recently, then it's mediocre depending on how long ago it was. In what scenario is it some spectacular & useful product? [1] http://static.azinman.com/pdfs/dataportraiture.pdf http://static.azinman.com/pdfs/dataportraiture.pdf [2] http://yosinski.com/deepvis http://yosinski.com/deepvis