I respect the Erlang/OTP model a lot. This library is inspired by that. I don't have the illusion to get anywhere close to it in a reasonable amount of time. T

I respect the Erlang/OTP model a lot. This library is inspired by that. I don't have the illusion to get anywhere close to it in a reasonable amount of time. There are also differences to the Erlang/OTP too. This library uses typed messages and taking advantage of the compiler to do type checking. I found it is easier to create this library if 1) the number of input and output channels are fixed 2) the topology of who sends to whom is fixed when the tasks are passed to the scheduler.