4 ms·
Cohesion is not an inverse-square field
by gohrt 10y ago
Cohesion is not an inverse-square field
- justifier 10y agogp> because water does not attract other water in any way though i was merely addressing this quote your comment confuses me both in fillip and content from cohesion wiki(o): Water, for example, is strongly cohesive as each molecule may make four hydrogen bonds to other water molecules in a tetrahedral configuration. This results in a relatively strong Coulomb force between molecules. from coulomb force wiki(i): Coulomb's law or Coulomb's inverse-square law, is a law of physics that describes force interacting between static electrically charged particles. (o) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohesion_(chemistry) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohesion_(chemistry) (i) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_law
- seiferteric 10y agoYes I knew water attracts water, but it is not relevant to the capacitor analogy. You might as well have said water attracts water via gravity, it's just not relevant in this situation.
- dotancohen 10y agoGravity does have an inverse-square attraction. Though obviously it is several orders magnitude less than electromagnetism, in fact the analogy holds.