2 ms·
> Do you have a link to the talk? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRWZBWwBVR0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRWZBWwBVR0 (I can't listen to the audio now so
by sndean 10y ago
> Do you have a link to the talk?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRWZBWwBVR0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRWZBWwBVR0 (I can't listen to the audio now so I'm not sure how much I misparaphrased.)
And, you're right, I shouldn't have conflated KDB+ with K.
> if you learn the language, you'll find it perfectly readable, elegant even.
Just comparing K to something like Python.. Though, personally, it only became (somewhat) readable after playing with APL and J for a year.
- qewbie 10y agothank you for the link. It's at 12:28 in the talk where he mentions the firm is Conning, who used k for financial simulations for insurance. In this talk, he doesn't suggest he is working with other firms to replace k/q/kdb+.