3 ms·
It's reasonable for this resource to be assigned to an incident of this nature and magnitude. Is it not?
by pohl 17y ago
It's reasonable for this resource to be assigned to an incident of this nature and magnitude. Is it not?
- trezor 17y agoThis incident being a phone who some Apple fanboys claims to be stolen, not lost, I'd say a most definite "no".
- pohl 17y agoI think you've failed to capture he essence of the incident. Try this: http://jballer.tumblr.com/post/540967372/gizmodos-trade-secret-liability http://jballer.tumblr.com/post/540967372/gizmodos-trade-secr...
- pyre 17y agoHow to 'trade secrets' translate to 'computer crime?' If I steal the blueprints for the 'better mousetrap,' then does it become a 'computer crime' because I'm liable to stealing trade secrets?
- pohl 17y agoI don't follow you: Is someone claiming that trade secrets imply computer crime? The strongest claim that I see is that REACT is an appropriate resource to assign. Do you see anything about REACT that implies otherwise? http://www.reacttf.org/10701.html http://www.reacttf.org/10701.html It says on the bottom of their front page that they investigate trade secret matters: http://www.reacttf.org/2101.html http://www.reacttf.org/2101.html Why harp on the phrase "computer crime" in the first place? I don't see it mentioned on the REACT site at all. It appears to have been an oversimplification invented by a journalist and propagated here by jrockway's question.