8 ms·

Good thing, atleast you read this one before ignoring:- https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09/exclusive-new-email-leak-reveals-clinton-campaigns-cozy-press-relati

Good thing, atleast you read this one before ignoring:- https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09/exclusive-new-email-leak-reveals-clinton-campaigns-cozy-press-relationship/ https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09/exclusive-new-email-leak... Don't give me your attitude. I got one wrong and admit the mistake on that one. That does not really refute any other emails.

_fizz_buzz_ 10y ago
> Don't give me your attitude. You are right. I apologize for the dismissive tone of my comment.
Angostura 10y ago
The trouble is, when you get the first one wrong, it doesn't encourage people to take the time to read the rest.
croon 10y ago
> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4213#efmDVTDWd https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4213#efmDVTDWd Mark Leibovich giving veto power on a clinton piece. You got the second one wrong as well, so I stopped there instead. He was giving veto on what to use on off-the-record questions, which I hope you agree, is a very good practice. Someone else can deal with your third, and fourth... But if you want apples to apples, it's unfortunate that you can't dig through Trumps emails [1]. It's sad that politics is no longer about politics. [1] http://europe.newsweek.com/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-emails-documents-515120 http://europe.newsweek.com/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-...