4 ms·

Question: how good are Roombas at actually cleaning? With an actual vacuum, I can turn it high or low, or press it harder or easier, or stick it at weird angles

Question: how good are Roombas at actually cleaning? With an actual vacuum, I can turn it high or low, or press it harder or easier, or stick it at weird angles to make it clean. How good are Roombas in comparison?

DashRattlesnake 10y ago
It depends. For me, the automatically-scheduled Roomba does a much better job than me failing to vacuum at all for months. However, my Dyson certainly pulls more dirt out of the carpet when I bother to use it.
deleted 10y ago
[deleted]
stevekemp 10y ago
A human can do a better job, but they are actually pretty good. I had one about five years ago, and so long as I pressed the "clean" button every day when I left my flat it was good enough that I only manually cleaned every two weeks or so. My place was ideal though, all on one floor, with no steps, and polished wooden floorboards + thin carpets only. I expect modern ones are better in terms of suction, battery life, and I know that you can schedule them so that removes the element of having to remember to press the button
- mulletbum 10y ago
  The newest model, which I don't suggest, will schedule, but if you have a large space it will actually vacuum, charge, and vacuum some more till its algorithm thinks the entire room should be done.
lobster_johnson 10y ago
It is actually very good, by virtue of running every day (unless you change its schedule to something else). So even though its suction doesn't compare well to a real big canister/bag vacuum, it makes up for that in sheer level of activity. It's not perfect. I have a single-floor apartment with no door thresholds, yet it keeps getting stuck. I keep cables and so on neatly organized and hidden, but sometimes I've left a temporary charger cord or something on the floor; this kills the Roomba. You also have to careful with plants -- it ate a whole branch of a plant once that was hanging low near the floor. It has issues with rugs, especially with black areas, but also just getting onto the rug. It also loves to close the door on a room so that it can't get out; I had to buy a couple of door wedges to prevent that, but I don't always remember to use them. Pretty much 50% of the time I come home to find the Roomba dead in a corner. Its dust compartment is quite small and must be emptied at least every 2-3 days. You also have to take out the little spindle things and remove hair which collects around the axles. Fortunately, the Roomba is really modular in design; you can take it apart completely, and there are replacement parts for absolutely everything. It is a rare product where the designers seem to have rejected the trend of planned obsolescence; I haven't really owned it long enough to be qualified to judge, or taken it apart, but everything I have seen indicates that it was carefully engineered to be repairable and last a long time. (It's probably hackable, too.) Despite its weaknessss, I am quite happy with it. It keeps my apartment clean and removes the mental burden of thinking about dust. A couple of times a month I take my Dyson to clear up some corners that the Roomba can't get to where dust bunnies pile up. I have a friend who combines it with the cleaning model, but I can't deal with two gadgets that leave their depleted, cable-choked corpses around.
- 6DM 10y ago
  I wanted to confirm these findings and add something else. When my roommate bought it, I thought it was pretty useless. Even just seeing it in action makes you wonder how it get's anything done. It basically runs in random patterns and takes forever. But after I moved to a different apartment, and he got his own place. I really saw how much work that thing was doing. I forgot how often the floors need to be swept to keep it clean. I plan to buy one myself once I move at the end of this month.
  - Alphasite_ 10y ago
    The newer ones allegedly dont do the random pattern thing anymore.
    - lobster_johnson 10y ago
      The 900 series (at least the 980) has a new navigation system.
astrange 10y ago
They're pretty decent, but you can't leave anything on the floor. Cables will get eaten, and anything expensive will get scratched as it constantly runs itself into it.
lostlogin 10y ago
On low? People do this? I've asked at shops about the low setting and they say it's for doing the curtains, which isn't anything I've ever done (or the walls and ceilings for that matter). I've only ever wanted high and maybe high x3.
- wfunction 10y ago
  You don't really always need it all the way up to the highest possible when you're dealing with e.g. hard floors IMO. Though your mileage may vary obviously (and that wasn't really a crucial part of my comment).
chrisper 10y ago
I had one and eventually sold it and went back to the regular vacuum. You can't have anything on the floor, so I wasn't really able to let it run while I am not at home because I was afraid it would hit stuff. Sometimes it even pushes furniture around or bumps into other stuff and scratches it. I can vacuum my whole apartment in a lot less time than when using the roomba. The roomba kept blowing around the dog hair and ignore spots, but kept going over the same spots a thousand times.

DashRattlesnake 10y ago

It depends. For me, the automatically-scheduled Roomba does a much better job than me failing to vacuum at all for months. However, my Dyson certainly pulls more dirt out of the carpet when I bother to use it.

deleted 10y ago

[deleted]

stevekemp 10y ago

A human can do a better job, but they are actually pretty good. I had one about five years ago, and so long as I pressed the "clean" button every day when I left my flat it was good enough that I only manually cleaned every two weeks or so. My place was ideal though, all on one floor, with no steps, and polished wooden floorboards + thin carpets only. I expect modern ones are better in terms of suction, battery life, and I know that you can schedule them so that removes the element of having to remember to press the button

mulletbum 10y ago
The newest model, which I don't suggest, will schedule, but if you have a large space it will actually vacuum, charge, and vacuum some more till its algorithm thinks the entire room should be done.

lobster_johnson 10y ago

It is actually very good, by virtue of running every day (unless you change its schedule to something else). So even though its suction doesn't compare well to a real big canister/bag vacuum, it makes up for that in sheer level of activity. It's not perfect. I have a single-floor apartment with no door thresholds, yet it keeps getting stuck. I keep cables and so on neatly organized and hidden, but sometimes I've left a temporary charger cord or something on the floor; this kills the Roomba. You also have to careful with plants -- it ate a whole branch of a plant once that was hanging low near the floor. It has issues with rugs, especially with black areas, but also just getting onto the rug. It also loves to close the door on a room so that it can't get out; I had to buy a couple of door wedges to prevent that, but I don't always remember to use them. Pretty much 50% of the time I come home to find the Roomba dead in a corner. Its dust compartment is quite small and must be emptied at least every 2-3 days. You also have to take out the little spindle things and remove hair which collects around the axles. Fortunately, the Roomba is really modular in design; you can take it apart completely, and there are replacement parts for absolutely everything. It is a rare product where the designers seem to have rejected the trend of planned obsolescence; I haven't really owned it long enough to be qualified to judge, or taken it apart, but everything I have seen indicates that it was carefully engineered to be repairable and last a long time. (It's probably hackable, too.) Despite its weaknessss, I am quite happy with it. It keeps my apartment clean and removes the mental burden of thinking about dust. A couple of times a month I take my Dyson to clear up some corners that the Roomba can't get to where dust bunnies pile up. I have a friend who combines it with the cleaning model, but I can't deal with two gadgets that leave their depleted, cable-choked corpses around.

6DM 10y ago
I wanted to confirm these findings and add something else. When my roommate bought it, I thought it was pretty useless. Even just seeing it in action makes you wonder how it get's anything done. It basically runs in random patterns and takes forever. But after I moved to a different apartment, and he got his own place. I really saw how much work that thing was doing. I forgot how often the floors need to be swept to keep it clean. I plan to buy one myself once I move at the end of this month.
- Alphasite_ 10y ago
  The newer ones allegedly dont do the random pattern thing anymore.
  - lobster_johnson 10y ago
    The 900 series (at least the 980) has a new navigation system.

astrange 10y ago

They're pretty decent, but you can't leave anything on the floor. Cables will get eaten, and anything expensive will get scratched as it constantly runs itself into it.

lostlogin 10y ago

On low? People do this? I've asked at shops about the low setting and they say it's for doing the curtains, which isn't anything I've ever done (or the walls and ceilings for that matter). I've only ever wanted high and maybe high x3.

wfunction 10y ago
You don't really always need it all the way up to the highest possible when you're dealing with e.g. hard floors IMO. Though your mileage may vary obviously (and that wasn't really a crucial part of my comment).

chrisper 10y ago

I had one and eventually sold it and went back to the regular vacuum. You can't have anything on the floor, so I wasn't really able to let it run while I am not at home because I was afraid it would hit stuff. Sometimes it even pushes furniture around or bumps into other stuff and scratches it. I can vacuum my whole apartment in a lot less time than when using the roomba. The roomba kept blowing around the dog hair and ignore spots, but kept going over the same spots a thousand times.