To be pedantic, evolution doesn't have to be evolution by natural selection. The word "evolution" is used all the time to describe changes in cultures, technolo

To be pedantic, evolution doesn't have to be evolution by natural selection. The word "evolution" is used all the time to describe changes in cultures, technologies, and individuals. These aren't even poetic extensions of Darwinian evolution; the term was in use before Darwin was born. Your point still stands, of course. The original author obviously has no idea how biological evolution works, and their theory is pseudoscientific nonsense.