5 ms·

Fortunately, folks "woke up" a bit as a result of that event (granted, security wasn't really a concern at that time). Unfortunately, it was relatively quickly

Fortunately, folks "woke up" a bit as a result of that event (granted, security wasn't really a concern at that time). Unfortunately, it was relatively quickly forgotten and it took another 10-15 years before security really became something that was looked at as anything other than an inconvenience or an impediment. I'm becoming more and more convinced that nothing is going to change (with regard to overall security in general) until we have some huge event that negatively impacts a large portion of the population in a major way. Until then, things will continue as they are, and security won't be taken seriously. I'm ready for the 2016 version of the 1988 sendmail worm (or perhaps something with the "average user"-visible impact of the 1990 AT&T crash), just to "get it over with" and get us moving forward.

rhizome 10y ago
The lack of liability changes in the wake of the Target breach (at the very least) means that companies can foist whatever security model they feel like upon the market without any possible repercussions. You basically have to be VW compromising a highly regulated industry for there to be any negative effects beyond PR, and internet-accessible data is so far completely unregulated.
- the_unknown 10y ago
  And even then the benefits to ignoring the warnings for companies is still pretty powerful. VW may have been caught and punished in the US but here in Canada they are still dragging their feet with any mention of compensation to victims and our courts are letting them. "We can't keep driving these and feel good about ourselves. So something needs to be done and I just want an answer.… It's not about the initial mistake — it's what you do to make things better." http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/vw-emissions-1.3708372 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/vw-emissions-1.3708372
tech2 10y ago
Even if a big event occurs I think the security drive will be short-lived. You'll then find a few manufacturers taking shortcuts to beat their security-minded colleagues to market... then the floodgates open again as everyone races to the bottom.

rhizome 10y ago

The lack of liability changes in the wake of the Target breach (at the very least) means that companies can foist whatever security model they feel like upon the market without any possible repercussions. You basically have to be VW compromising a highly regulated industry for there to be any negative effects beyond PR, and internet-accessible data is so far completely unregulated.

the_unknown 10y ago
And even then the benefits to ignoring the warnings for companies is still pretty powerful. VW may have been caught and punished in the US but here in Canada they are still dragging their feet with any mention of compensation to victims and our courts are letting them. "We can't keep driving these and feel good about ourselves. So something needs to be done and I just want an answer.… It's not about the initial mistake — it's what you do to make things better." http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/vw-emissions-1.3708372 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/vw-emissions-1.3708372

tech2 10y ago

Even if a big event occurs I think the security drive will be short-lived. You'll then find a few manufacturers taking shortcuts to beat their security-minded colleagues to market... then the floodgates open again as everyone races to the bottom.