3 ms·
Windows 3.1 didn't have a combined file manager/program launcher. Instead, there were two different apps. There was the program manager: http://toastytech.com/
by david-given 10y ago
Windows 3.1 didn't have a combined file manager/program launcher. Instead, there were two different apps. There was the program manager:
http://toastytech.com/guis/win31progman3.png http://toastytech.com/guis/win31progman3.png
Those icons don't represent files; they are 'program items', i.e. launchers.
This was the file manager:
http://toastytech.com/guis/win31winfile.png http://toastytech.com/guis/win31winfile.png
You could launch programs from this, but only if you knew where they were installed and were willing to navigate there and then figure out which cryptically named .exe file it was. And, yes, the windows-in-windows organisation of both applications was a mess. Losing entire subwindows off the side of the program manager because you'd placed them somewhere and then resized the outer window, making them invisible, was totally a thing.
The classic Mac, with its combined file manager and program launcher, and its single-file applications (usually), and its human readable filenames, and generally a whole bunch of little subtle usability features such as the way that icons remembered whether they'd been placed manually or had been autoplaced, was enormously better.
- digi_owl 10y agoAh yes, progman. I am unsure if anyone ever ran it other than maximized (only pesky problem was that switching between running programs required a trip to the desktop, or remember to hit alt-tab). As for finding something based on directory location and file name, thats how you had to do it in the underlying DOS anyways so you quickly memorized your most used paths (if you fired up Windows at all).