I wonder how many people would accept a compromise of this: they vote to reduce building and density, but at the same time agree that their asset appreciation w

I wonder how many people would accept a compromise of this: they vote to reduce building and density, but at the same time agree that their asset appreciation will go mostly to the city (via cap gains or land value taxes), rather than themselves. (Obviously this goes against Prop 13, but I still wonder how many people would be willing to admit that they want space rather than money.)