4 ms·
Photos are still admissible, despite Photoshop existing for several decades.
by trendia 10y ago
Photos are still admissible, despite Photoshop existing for several decades.
- ch4s3 10y agoNot to mention, notoriously unreliable eyewitness accounts.
- webwielder2 10y agoPeople were convincingly doctoring photos looong before Photoshop.
- cptskippy 10y agoCommunist countries are notorious for making people disappear. http://www.businessinsider.com/people-who-were-erased-from-history-2013-12 http://www.businessinsider.com/people-who-were-erased-from-h...
- abritinthebay 10y agoTo be fair on that front: all evidence can be challenged as being false/fake/etc
- snowwrestler 10y agoRight, a photo (or recording) in court is only as good as what you can prove about its history. Same as with any piece of evidence, really.
- rhinoceraptor 10y agoDocuments are still admissible, even though there are copy machines known to alter documents when copying in certain cases: http://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_are_switching_written_numbers_when_scanning http://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_...