I have on my bookshelf "Unauthorized Freud". The book is not favorable to his work. Rather, he is described as a fraud. Now where he was right for the wrong re

I have on my bookshelf "Unauthorized Freud". The book is not favorable to his work. Rather, he is described as a fraud. Now where he was right for the wrong reasons, we could see him like we see Galilei today: As a popularizer of new ideas. There is no need to go further than that.