3 ms·
The 16Gb RAM 'let's throw the toys out of the pram' problem has not been handled very well. The Skylake CPUs I have seen all seem to be limited to 16Gb max RAM
by Theodores 10y ago
The 16Gb RAM 'let's throw the toys out of the pram' problem has not been handled very well.
The Skylake CPUs I have seen all seem to be limited to 16Gb max RAM. Allegedly there are desktop variants that take more. The Skylake CPUs also have fewer cores in them than one might expect, e.g. two cores (with hyperthreading so '4') in a i7 CPU, for years one has expected four cores (with HT, so '8') in anything branded 'i7'.
There is NVMe for the SSD and I am sure the Apple folks have some nifty driver to swap to disk a lot quicker than in the olden days. So main memory is a bit more like 'cache' in that there is no need to be that hung up on the specifics. If your main program can reside in 16Gb RAM with operating system then all is good. Throwing more memory at the CPU is not how it works on Skylake.
Apple could have avoided the latest CPUs but imagine the outrage of 'old hardware' The new CPUs are low power, you get all day battery. I also wonder whether those people complaining about a lack of RAM are after selling website clicks or doing real work.
- strictnein 10y agoReally not sure where you're getting your info. The Skylake series is not limited to two cores and can handle more than 16GB. With DDR3 it's 32GB, with DDR4 it's 64GB. This is true of their mobile and desktop parts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylake_(microarchitecture)#List_of_Skylake_processors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylake_(microarchitecture)#Li... Edit: Maybe you're just confusing Skylake and Kaby Lake?