RMS is the author of the GPL, so the mere existance of a GPLv3 means that he wasn't happy with v2. It's also a basic assmption that RMS thinks projects using GN

RMS is the author of the GPL, so the mere existance of a GPLv3 means that he wasn't happy with v2. It's also a basic assmption that RMS thinks projects using GNU licensing should use GPLv3 when applicable. See for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#Version_3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#Ver....